FANG
Price
$140.22
Change
-$0.55 (-0.39%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
40.59B
85 days until earnings call
PED
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
55.02M
92 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs PED

Header iconFANG vs PED Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs PEDBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$140.22
Change-$0.55 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization40.59B
PEDEV
Price$0.60
Change-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Volume$107.72K
Capitalization55.02M
FANG vs PED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. PED commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and PED is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $140.22 vs. PED: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. PED: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 81% vs. PED: 34%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $40.59B vs. PED: $55.02M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $40.59B. PED’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $55.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePED’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than PED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PED is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while PED (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

PED is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.17% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($40.6B) has a higher market cap than PED($55M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than PED: FANG (10.16) vs PED (4.28). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -12.583 vs. PED (-22.982). PED has less debt than FANG: PED (203K) vs FANG (13.9B).
FANGPEDFANG / PED
Capitalization40.6B55M73,818%
EBITDAN/A20.5M-
Gain YTD-12.583-22.98255%
P/E Ratio10.164.28237%
RevenueN/A40.2M-
Total CashN/A10.4M-
Total Debt13.9B203K6,847,291%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs PED: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
PED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
5654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6077
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PED's Valuation (53) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FANG (63) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PED’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PED (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PED’s over the last 12 months.

PED's SMR Rating (54) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FANG (56) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PED’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PED (77) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to PED’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PED (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGPED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNDAU12.99N/A
N/A
Concord Acquisition Corp II
ARGC2.50N/A
N/A
Arion Group Corp.
SGHIY14.14N/A
N/A
Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd.
CCDBF58.38-0.26
-0.45%
CCL Industries Inc.
CFNB18.80-0.21
-1.10%
California First Leasing Corporation

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with DVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then DVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-0.39%
DVN - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
MTDR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
PR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
OVV - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
CHRD - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
More

PED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PED has been loosely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PED jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PED
1D Price
Change %
PED100%
-3.35%
PR - PED
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
EOG - PED
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
HUSA - PED
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
FANG - PED
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
USEG - PED
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More