FANG
Price
$146.31
Change
-$0.60 (-0.41%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
41.92B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTDR
Price
$41.55
Change
-$0.18 (-0.43%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.16B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs MTDR

Header iconFANG vs MTDR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs MTDRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$146.31
Change-$0.60 (-0.41%)
Volume$985.33K
Capitalization41.92B
Matador Resources
Price$41.55
Change-$0.18 (-0.43%)
Volume$696.84K
Capitalization5.16B
FANG vs MTDR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. MTDR commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Buy and MTDR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $146.31 vs. MTDR: $41.55)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. MTDR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 57% vs. MTDR: 37%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $41.92B vs. MTDR: $5.16B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $41.92B. MTDR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $5.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $113.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than MTDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTDR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTDR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTDR is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while MTDR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

MTDR is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.71% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($41.9B) has a higher market cap than MTDR($5.16B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than MTDR: FANG (10.27) vs MTDR (6.66). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -8.787 vs. MTDR (-23.938). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. MTDR (2.54B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 159M vs. MTDR (20.2M). MTDR has less debt than FANG: MTDR (3.33B) vs FANG (16.2B). FANG has higher revenues than MTDR: FANG (15.3B) vs MTDR (3.83B).
FANGMTDRFANG / MTDR
Capitalization41.9B5.16B812%
EBITDA10.8B2.54B425%
Gain YTD-8.787-23.93837%
P/E Ratio10.276.66154%
Revenue15.3B3.83B400%
Total Cash159M20.2M787%
Total Debt16.2B3.33B486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs MTDR: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
MTDR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3647
SMR RATING
1..100
6754
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTDR's Valuation (76) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (94). This means that MTDR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (47). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

MTDR's SMR Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (67). This means that MTDR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (63). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (57). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGMTDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTDR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIL90.012.34
+2.67%
Global X Silver Miners ETF
PSQ29.720.01
+0.03%
ProShares Short QQQ
FEUS75.270.01
+0.01%
FlexShares ESG & Clmt US Lrg Cap Cr Idx
AMZP28.33-0.08
-0.28%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Amazon ETF
NBET32.46-0.16
-0.49%
Neuberger Berman Engy Trnstn & InfrasETF

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-0.41%
PR - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
OVV - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
DVN - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
CHRD - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
MTDR - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More

MTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTDR has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTDR jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTDR
1D Price
Change %
MTDR100%
-0.43%
PR - MTDR
90%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
OVV - MTDR
90%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
SM - MTDR
89%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
CHRD - MTDR
88%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
FANG - MTDR
88%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More