FANG
Price
$168.99
Change
+$6.11 (+3.75%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
48.42B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGY
Price
$26.39
Change
+$0.76 (+2.97%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs MGY

Header iconFANG vs MGY Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs MGYBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$168.99
Change+$6.11 (+3.75%)
Volume$2.67M
Capitalization48.42B
Magnolia Oil & Gas
Price$26.39
Change+$0.76 (+2.97%)
Volume$4.16M
Capitalization4.83B
FANG vs MGY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. MGY commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and MGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FANG: $168.99 vs. MGY: $26.39)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. MGY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 139% vs. MGY: 165%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $48.42B vs. MGY: $4.83B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $48.42B. MGY’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $4.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $132.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +5.44% price change this week, while MGY (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2026.

MGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($48.4B) has a higher market cap than MGY($4.83B). MGY has higher P/E ratio than FANG: MGY (14.66) vs FANG (11.87). MGY YTD gains are higher at: 20.557 vs. FANG (12.413). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. MGY (890M). MGY has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. FANG (159M). MGY has less debt than FANG: MGY (412M) vs FANG (16.2B). FANG has higher revenues than MGY: FANG (15.3B) vs MGY (1.32B).
FANGMGYFANG / MGY
Capitalization48.4B4.83B1,001%
EBITDA10.8B890M1,213%
Gain YTD12.41320.55760%
P/E Ratio11.8714.6681%
Revenue15.3B1.32B1,158%
Total Cash159M280M57%
Total Debt16.2B412M3,932%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs MGY: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
MGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3629
SMR RATING
1..100
6750
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGY's Valuation (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (94). This means that MGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (36). This means that MGY’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MGY's SMR Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (67). This means that MGY’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (46). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (28). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGMGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBJP103.551.91
+1.88%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
PDI18.450.01
+0.05%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
SPC18.98N/A
N/A
CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF
PCF6.03-0.02
-0.33%
High Income Securities Fund
ELC20.78-0.07
-0.34%
Entergy Louisiana LLC