FANG
Price
$148.25
Change
+$2.46 (+1.69%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.92B
43 days until earnings call
KOS
Price
$1.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
856.07M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs KOS

Header iconFANG vs KOS Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs KOSBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$148.25
Change+$2.46 (+1.69%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization42.92B
Kosmos Energy
Price$1.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.58M
Capitalization856.07M
FANG vs KOS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. KOS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and KOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $148.25 vs. KOS: $1.79)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. KOS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 82% vs. KOS: 97%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $42.92B vs. KOS: $856.07M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $42.92B. KOS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $856.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKOS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than KOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KOS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KOS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than KOS.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +6.14% price change this week, while KOS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +5.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

KOS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.79% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($42.9B) has a higher market cap than KOS($856M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than KOS: FANG (10.74) vs KOS (3.98). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -7.577 vs. KOS (-47.661). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. KOS (619M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. KOS (51.7M). KOS has less debt than FANG: KOS (2.85B) vs FANG (15.1B). FANG has higher revenues than KOS: FANG (14B) vs KOS (1.49B).
FANGKOSFANG / KOS
Capitalization42.9B856M5,012%
EBITDA9.71B619M1,569%
Gain YTD-7.577-47.66116%
P/E Ratio10.743.98270%
Revenue14B1.49B941%
Total Cash219M51.7M424%
Total Debt15.1B2.85B530%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs KOS: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
KOS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1385
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3495
SMR RATING
1..100
5795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5782
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KOS's Valuation (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (67). This means that KOS’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOS (95). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOS (95). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as KOS (82). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for KOS (98). This means that FANG’s stock grew significantly faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGKOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPH28.730.33
+1.16%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
PPTY30.810.22
+0.71%
Vident U.S. Diversified Real Estate ETF
SPMO120.580.27
+0.22%
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
XMAR39.210.08
+0.20%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
MHNC17.560.01
+0.07%
MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+1.69%
MTDR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
PR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
CHRD - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
DVN - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+3.44%
OVV - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More

KOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KOS has been closely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KOS jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KOS
1D Price
Change %
KOS100%
N/A
FANG - KOS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
PR - KOS
75%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
MTDR - KOS
74%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
BTE - KOS
74%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
SM - KOS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More