FANG
Price
$154.91
Change
+$5.58 (+3.74%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
35.57B
50 days until earnings call
KOS
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.16 (+7.66%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.76B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs KOS

Header iconFANG vs KOS Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs KOSBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$154.91
Change+$5.58 (+3.74%)
Volume$5.21M
Capitalization35.57B
Kosmos Energy
Price$2.25
Change+$0.16 (+7.66%)
Volume$26M
Capitalization2.76B
FANG vs KOS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. KOS commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Buy and KOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $154.91 vs. KOS: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. KOS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 216% vs. KOS: 223%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. KOS: $2.76B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. KOS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKOS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than KOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KOS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KOS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KOS is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +10.21% price change this week, while KOS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +18.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

KOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.89% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than KOS($2.76B). KOS has higher P/E ratio than FANG: KOS (13.32) vs FANG (11.50). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -4.115 vs. KOS (-34.211). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. KOS (931M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. KOS (95.3M). KOS has less debt than FANG: KOS (2.39B) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than KOS: FANG (8.34B) vs KOS (1.7B).
FANGKOSFANG / KOS
Capitalization35.6B2.76B1,288%
EBITDA6.17B931M663%
Gain YTD-4.115-34.21112%
P/E Ratio11.5013.3286%
Revenue8.34B1.7B490%
Total Cash582M95.3M611%
Total Debt6.8B2.39B284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs KOS: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
KOS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2990
SMR RATING
1..100
5690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANG's Valuation (50) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as KOS (67). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOS (90). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (56) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOS (90). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as KOS (61). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to KOS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOS (98). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGKOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMC48.38-0.27
-0.55%
Commercial Metals Company
CMG50.24-0.65
-1.28%
Chipotle Mexican Grill
PHR25.99-0.63
-2.37%
Phreesia
RMNI3.29-0.10
-2.95%
Rimini Street
MESA0.96-0.05
-4.86%
Mesa Air Group

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+3.74%
OVV - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
DVN - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+2.99%
PR - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
CHRD - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
COP - FANG
87%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
More

KOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KOS has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KOS jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KOS
1D Price
Change %
KOS100%
+7.66%
OVV - KOS
73%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
PR - KOS
73%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
BTE - KOS
72%
Closely correlated
+3.98%
VET - KOS
71%
Closely correlated
+4.04%
FANG - KOS
71%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
More