FANG
Price
$167.37
Change
+$4.49 (+2.76%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.67B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFR
Price
$5.55
Change
+$0.07 (+1.28%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
687.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs GFR

Header iconFANG vs GFR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs GFRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$167.37
Change+$4.49 (+2.76%)
Volume$2.31K
Capitalization46.67B
Greenfire Resources
Price$5.55
Change+$0.07 (+1.28%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization687.21M
FANG vs GFR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. GFR commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and GFR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FANG: $162.88 vs. GFR: $5.48)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. GFR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 99% vs. GFR: 38%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $46.67B vs. GFR: $687.21M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $46.67B. GFR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $687.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $129.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FANG and GFR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFR is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($46.7B) has a higher market cap than GFR($687M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than GFR: FANG (11.44) vs GFR (4.44). GFR YTD gains are higher at: 15.126 vs. FANG (8.348). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. GFR (196M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 159M vs. GFR (115M). GFR has less debt than FANG: GFR (329M) vs FANG (16.2B). FANG has higher revenues than GFR: FANG (15.3B) vs GFR (678M).
FANGGFRFANG / GFR
Capitalization46.7B687M6,798%
EBITDA10.8B196M5,510%
Gain YTD8.34815.12655%
P/E Ratio11.444.44258%
Revenue15.3B678M2,257%
Total Cash159M115M138%
Total Debt16.2B329M4,924%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGGFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAIL62.114.10
+7.07%
Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF
GBIL99.950.01
+0.01%
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Yr ETF
PCF6.05-0.01
-0.17%
High Income Securities Fund
FEBZ37.90-0.23
-0.60%
TrueShares Structured OutcomeFebruaryETF
STHH54.89-1.95
-3.43%
STMICROELECTRONICS NV ADRHEDGED STHH

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+2.67%
OVV - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+3.84%
MTDR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
CHRD - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
PR - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
DVN - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
More

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
+2.62%
KRP - GFR
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
FANG - GFR
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
BTE - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.45%
CNQ - GFR
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
DVN - GFR
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More