Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALIX vs RWMFX
FALIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FALIX vs RWMFX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap I
Price$60.19
Change-$0.38 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FALIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FALIX (1.92B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FALIX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FALIX (0.58). FALIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FALIX (30 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FALIX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FALIX (18.00). FALIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FALIX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FALIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.15 vs. RWMFX (7.95). FALIX return over 5 years is better than : 103.78 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| FALIX | RWMFX | FALIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.31 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.31 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.261 | 8.213 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 205B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.43 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.15 | 7.95 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.58 | 34.82 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.78 | 50.81 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.62 | 83.34 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement