FALC vs WRDLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Hold and WRDLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FALC | WRDLY | FALC / WRDLY | |
| Capitalization | 9.62M | 3.31B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -382.26K | 768M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 28.955 | -62.811 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.87 | - |
| Revenue | 10.3M | 4.02B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.84M | 1.17B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.28M | 5.05B | 0% |
FALC | WRDLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRDLY's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FALC (75) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FALC’s over the last 12 months.
WRDLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.
WRDLY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.
FALC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (89) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
FALC's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as WRDLY (99) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
FALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FALC | 100% | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - FALC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| OLO - FALC | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| DOX - FALC | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.35% | ||
| EVCM - FALC | 22% Poorly correlated | -7.01% | ||
| RMDEF - FALC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WRDLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with OLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then OLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRDLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRDLY | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| OLO - WRDLY | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| FALC - WRDLY | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NEXXY - WRDLY | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EVCM - WRDLY | 38% Loosely correlated | -7.01% | ||
| ADYEY - WRDLY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||