FALC
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.05 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.61M
WRDLY
Price
$4.09
Change
-$0.06 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.31B
Ad is loading...

FALC vs WRDLY

Header iconFALC vs WRDLY Comparison
Open Charts FALC vs WRDLYBanner chart's image
FalconStor Software
Price$1.85
Change-$0.05 (-2.63%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.61M
Worldline SA
Price$4.09
Change-$0.06 (-1.45%)
Volume$7.44K
Capitalization3.31B
FALC vs WRDLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FALC vs. WRDLY commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Hold and WRDLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FALC: $1.85 vs. WRDLY: $4.15)
Brand notoriety: FALC and WRDLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FALC: 5% vs. WRDLY: 22%
Market capitalization -- FALC: $9.61M vs. WRDLY: $3.31B
FALC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.61M. WRDLY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FALC and WRDLY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WRDLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WRDLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +36.03% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.66% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRDLY($3.31B) has a higher market cap than FALC($9.62M). WRDLY YTD gains are higher at: -2.353 vs. FALC (-7.500). WRDLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 768M vs. FALC (-382.26K). WRDLY has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has less debt than WRDLY: FALC (2.28M) vs WRDLY (5.05B). WRDLY has higher revenues than FALC: WRDLY (4.02B) vs FALC (10.3M).
FALCWRDLYFALC / WRDLY
Capitalization9.62M3.31B0%
EBITDA-382.26K768M-0%
Gain YTD-7.500-2.353319%
P/E RatioN/A12.87-
Revenue10.3M4.02B0%
Total Cash1.84M1.17B0%
Total Debt2.28M5.05B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC vs WRDLY: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
WRDLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9153
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDLY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FALC (77) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WRDLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WRDLY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as WRDLY (64) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (99) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WRDLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
-2.63%
WRDLY - FALC
40%
Loosely correlated
+7.93%
OLO - FALC
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
DOX - FALC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
EVCM - FALC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
RMDEF - FALC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRDLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with OLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then OLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDLY
1D Price
Change %
WRDLY100%
+7.93%
OLO - WRDLY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
FALC - WRDLY
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
NEXXY - WRDLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EVCM - WRDLY
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
ADYEY - WRDLY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More