FALC
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.72M
RMDEF
Price
$17.92
Change
-$2.35 (-11.59%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
235.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FALC vs RMDEF

Header iconFALC vs RMDEF Comparison
Open Charts FALC vs RMDEFBanner chart's image
FalconStor Software
Price$1.78
Change-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Volume$205
Capitalization12.72M
REMEDY ENTMT OYJ
Price$17.92
Change-$2.35 (-11.59%)
Volume$245
Capitalization235.27M
FALC vs RMDEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMDEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FALC vs. RMDEF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Hold and RMDEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FALC: $1.78 vs. RMDEF: $17.92)
Brand notoriety: FALC and RMDEF are both not notable
FALC represents the Packaged Software, while RMDEF is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FALC: 18% vs. RMDEF: 99%
Market capitalization -- FALC: $12.72M vs. RMDEF: $235.27M
FALC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.72M. RMDEF’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $235.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMDEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMDEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FALC and RMDEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FALC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMDEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FALC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMDEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMDEF is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while RMDEF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +6.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Electronics/Appliances (+6.98% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMDEF($235M) has a higher market cap than FALC($12.7M). RMDEF YTD gains are higher at: -10.400 vs. FALC (-11.000). RMDEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.9M vs. FALC (1.84M). RMDEF has more cash in the bank: 27.6M vs. FALC (2.86M). FALC has less debt than RMDEF: FALC (2.33M) vs RMDEF (17.6M). RMDEF has higher revenues than FALC: RMDEF (59.8M) vs FALC (11.2M).
FALCRMDEFFALC / RMDEF
Capitalization12.7M235M5%
EBITDA1.84M13.9M13%
Gain YTD-11.000-10.400106%
P/E RatioN/A379.23-
Revenue11.2M59.8M19%
Total Cash2.86M27.6M10%
Total Debt2.33M17.6M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FALCRMDEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMDEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAOPX16.88N/A
N/A
Barrett Opportunity Retail
SCAUX12.01N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund A
MDFOX8.22N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Inv A
FCASX30.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
AUICX35.53N/A
N/A
AB Equity Income C

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
OLO - FALC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOX - FALC
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
EVCM - FALC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
RMDEF - FALC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMDEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMDEF has been loosely correlated with IONI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMDEF jumps, then IONI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMDEF
1D Price
Change %
RMDEF100%
N/A
IONI - RMDEF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ROIUF - RMDEF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMICY - RMDEF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RSASF - RMDEF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRXXF - RMDEF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More