FALC
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.72M
OLO
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FALC vs OLO

Header iconFALC vs OLO Comparison
Open Charts FALC vs OLOBanner chart's image
FalconStor Software
Price$1.78
Change-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Volume$205
Capitalization12.72M
Olo
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.72M
Capitalization1.74B
FALC vs OLO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FALC vs. OLO commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Hold and OLO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FALC: $1.78 vs. OLO: $10.26)
Brand notoriety: FALC and OLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FALC: 18% vs. OLO: 238%
Market capitalization -- FALC: $12.72M vs. OLO: $1.74B
FALC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.72M. OLO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FALC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FALC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLO($1.74B) has a higher market cap than FALC($12.7M). OLO YTD gains are higher at: 33.594 vs. FALC (-11.000). OLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.6M vs. FALC (1.84M). OLO has more cash in the bank: 377M vs. FALC (2.86M). FALC has less debt than OLO: FALC (2.33M) vs OLO (12.7M). OLO has higher revenues than FALC: OLO (314M) vs FALC (11.2M).
FALCOLOFALC / OLO
Capitalization12.7M1.74B1%
EBITDA1.84M16.6M11%
Gain YTD-11.00033.594-33%
P/E RatioN/A1039.00-
Revenue11.2M314M4%
Total Cash2.86M377M1%
Total Debt2.33M12.7M18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC vs OLO: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
OLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2634
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FALC (74) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FALC’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (50) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (53) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FALCOLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.411.14
+4.53%
GameStop Corp
TSLA440.4217.03
+4.02%
Tesla
SPY661.783.73
+0.57%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL255.46-1.41
-0.55%
Apple

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
OLO - FALC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOX - FALC
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
EVCM - FALC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
RMDEF - FALC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
N/A
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EVCM - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
SHOP - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
QTWO - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
WEAV - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
More