Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMFEX
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$12.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.63M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FAKDX (90.6M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FAKDX (1.76) vs RMFEX (1.49). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. FAKDX (5.40). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. FAKDX (45.28).
| FAKDX | RMFEX | FAKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.323 | 11.638 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 8.06 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.73 | 33.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.28 | 58.84 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.16 | 98.59 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers