Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMFCX
FAKDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMFCX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.53M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
FAKDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FAKDX (82.5M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FAKDX (1.78) vs RMFCX (1.20). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMFCX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. FAKDX (-21.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. FAKDX (15.83).
| FAKDX | RMFCX | FAKDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.837 | 13.689 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.20 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.90 | 4.96 | -442% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 38.79 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.83 | 57.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.36 | 91.18 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement