Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMEBX
FAKDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMEBX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$12.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.63M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FAKDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FAKDX (90.6M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FAKDX (1.76) vs RMEBX (1.09). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMEBX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FAKDX (5.40). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. FAKDX (45.28).
| FAKDX | RMEBX | FAKDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.323 | 11.308 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.09 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 7.57 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.73 | 31.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.28 | 55.29 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.16 | 89.40 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement