Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFSX vs RPFGX
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFSX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
Price$36.69
Change+$0.29 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets705.69M
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFSX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FAFSX (706M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FAFSX: RPFGX (1.29) vs FAFSX (0.91). FAFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FAFSX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FAFSX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAFSX (4%) vs FAFSX (4%). FAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FAFSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. FAFSX (4.17). FAFSX (109.36) and RPFGX (108.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAFSX | RPFGX | FAFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.94 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.94 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.324 | 15.959 | 33% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 706M | 1.14B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 14.20 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.25 | 69.99 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.36 | 108.11 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.55 | 104.86 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement