Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFSX vs RPFGX
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFSX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
Price$38.42
Change+$0.28 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.73M
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFSX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. FAFSX (709M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FAFSX: RPFGX (1.29) vs FAFSX (0.90). FAFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FAFSX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FAFSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAFSX (4%) vs FAFSX (4%). FAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FAFSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.47 vs. FAFSX (17.79). FAFSX (140.46) and RPFGX (133.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAFSX | RPFGX | FAFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.169 | 20.893 | 53% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 709M | 1.19B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.29 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.79 | 25.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.90 | 88.88 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 140.46 | 133.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.30 | 126.64 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement