Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFSX vs RPFGX
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFSX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
Price$35.24
Change-$0.81 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.08M
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFSX is a StrongBuy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. FAFSX (662M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FAFSX: RPFGX (1.43) vs FAFSX (0.98). FAFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FAFSX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FAFSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAFSX (4%) vs FAFSX (4%). FAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FAFSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). FAFSX (24.76) and RPFGX (24.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FAFSX return over 5 years is better than : 114.91 vs. RPFGX (99.50).
| FAFSX | RPFGX | FAFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.311 | 7.361 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 662M | 1.05B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.43 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.76 | 24.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.89 | 59.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.91 | 99.50 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.32 | 82.67 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers