Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFSX vs RPFGX
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFSX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
Price$37.38
Change-$0.50 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.93M
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFSX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. FAFSX (684M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FAFSX: RPFGX (1.35) vs FAFSX (0.94). FAFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FAFSX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FAFSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAFSX (4%) vs FAFSX (4%). FAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FAFSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. FAFSX (22.93). FAFSX return over 5 years is better than : 117.88 vs. RPFGX (104.95).
| FAFSX | RPFGX | FAFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.259 | 15.834 | 58% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 684M | 1.13B | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.35 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.93 | 26.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.79 | 54.72 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.88 | 104.95 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.59 | 93.45 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement