Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs RDLCX
FAFGX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$89.46
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.28M
FAFGX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RDLCX (316M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FAFGX (0.49) vs RDLCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FAFGX (5 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FAFGX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. RDLCX (3.66). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.45 vs. RDLCX (1.61).
| FAFGX | RDLCX | FAFGX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.92 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.150 | 16.830 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 316M | 107,278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 3.66 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.58 | 42.14 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.45 | 1.61 | 2,146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement