Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs HSUCX
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$85.04
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.56M
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HSUCX (74.6M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FAFGX (0.52) vs HSUCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FAFGX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FAFGX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. FAFGX (14.99).
| FAFGX | HSUCX | FAFGX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.440 | 3.808 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 74.6M | 441,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.99 | 16.34 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 40.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -82.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement