Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs HSUCX
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$87.17
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.24
Change-$0.46 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.24M
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HSUCX (65.2M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FAFGX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FAFGX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FAFGX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. HSUCX (0.56). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.69 vs. HSUCX (-10.24).
| FAFGX | HSUCX | FAFGX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.306 | -0.186 | -9,317% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 65.2M | 521,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 0.56 | 1,241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.12 | 46.55 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.69 | -10.24 | -387% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -15.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement