Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs HSUCX
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$88.66
Change-$1.39 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.91
Change-$0.24 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.89M
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HSUCX (65.9M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FAFGX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FAFGX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FAFGX (32.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FAFGX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. HSUCX (-2.59). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.10 vs. HSUCX (-13.11).
| FAFGX | HSUCX | FAFGX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.15 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 2.15 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.182 | 2.632 | 805% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 65.9M | 514,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -2.59 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.77 | 56.74 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.10 | -13.11 | -275% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -8.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement