Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAD vs MDYG
FAD vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs MDYG
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$165.38
Change-$0.59 (-0.36%)
Volume$100
Net Assets381.57M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$94.63
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
Volume$36.34K
Net Assets2.5B
FAD vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. MDYG commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a StrongBuy and MDYG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.5B vs. FAD (382M). FAD has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FAD (20.200) vs MDYG (9.543). FAD was incepted earlier than MDYG: FAD (19 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FAD | MDYG | FAD / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 20.200 | 9.543 | 212% |
| Net Assets | 382M | 2.5B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.15 | 413% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 41.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 0.28 | 0.77 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||