Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAD vs MDYG
FAD vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs MDYG
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$156.52
Change-$5.36 (-3.31%)
Volume$6.72K
Net Assets344.43M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$90.25
Change-$2.16 (-2.34%)
Volume$78.98K
Net Assets2.37B
FAD vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. MDYG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Hold and MDYG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.37B vs. FAD (344M). FAD has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FAD (13.359) vs MDYG (6.973). FAD was incepted earlier than MDYG: FAD (19 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FAD | MDYG | FAD / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 13.359 | 6.973 | 192% |
| Net Assets | 344M | 2.37B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.15 | 413% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 41.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 0.28 | 0.78 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -3.31% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||