Ad is loading...
FAD vs IWP
FAD vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IWP
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$139.93
Change-$4.80 (-3.32%)
Volume$12.17K
Net Assets238.55M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$130.42
Change-$4.54 (-3.36%)
Volume$2.35M
Net Assets18.72B
FAD vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IWP commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 18.7B vs. FAD (239M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IWP (10.138) vs FAD (6.840). FAD was incepted earlier than IWP: FAD (18 years) vs IWP (24 years). FAD has a higher turnover IWP (26.00) vs IWP (26.00).
| FAD | IWP | FAD / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 6.840 | 10.138 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 239M | 18.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 125.00 | 26.00 | 481% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.47 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 21 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| CPRT - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| HUBB - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| URI - IWP | 67% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||