Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAD vs IMCG
FAD vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IMCG
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$147.89
Change+$1.31 (+0.89%)
Volume$2.14K
Net Assets288.81M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.29
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.64K
Net Assets2.84B
FAD vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Buy and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. FAD (289M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IMCG (7.995) vs FAD (7.058). FAD was incepted earlier than IMCG: FAD (18 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FAD | IMCG | FAD / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 7.058 | 7.995 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 289M | 2.84B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.06 | 1,033% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 43.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 0.52 | 0.75 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||