Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAD vs IMCG
FAD vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IMCG
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$139.48
Change-$2.10 (-1.48%)
Volume$15.04K
Net Assets279.21M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.68B
FAD vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IMCG commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Hold and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.68B vs. FAD (279M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IMCG (2.315) vs FAD (0.918). FAD was incepted earlier than IMCG: FAD (18 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FAD | IMCG | FAD / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 0.918 | 2.315 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 279M | 2.68B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.06 | 1,033% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 43.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 0.54 | 0.75 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 82% | 29 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 27 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||