FACT
Price
$10.29
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
157.3M
GIG
Price
$10.40
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
50.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACT vs GIG

Header iconFACT vs GIG Comparison
Open Charts FACT vs GIGBanner chart's image
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization157.3M
GigCapital7
Price$10.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$110
Capitalization50.8M
FACT vs GIG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACT vs. GIG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACT is a Hold and GIG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FACT: $10.29 vs. GIG: $10.40)
Brand notoriety: FACT and GIG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACT: 2% vs. GIG: 0%
Market capitalization -- FACT: $157.3M vs. GIG: $50.8M
FACT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $157.3M. GIG’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $50.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGIG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACT is a better buy in the long-term than GIG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GIG’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FACT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GIG’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FACT is a better buy in the short-term than GIG.

Price Growth

FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while GIG (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.66% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FACT($157M) has a higher market cap than GIG($50.8M). GIG (4.000) and FACT (3.973) have similar YTD gains . FACT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.83M vs. GIG (-9.23M). GIG has higher revenues than FACT: GIG (336M) vs FACT (0).
FACTGIGFACT / GIG
Capitalization157M50.8M309%
EBITDA-4.83M-9.23M52%
Gain YTD3.9734.00099%
P/E Ratio1000.00N/A-
Revenue0336M-
Total Cash47.5KN/A-
Total Debt2.77MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACTGIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
4%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
6%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
2%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADX1.610.09
+5.59%
LadRx Corporation
AMBBY15.45N/A
N/A
Ambu A/S
HSTI1.30N/A
N/A
High Sierra Technologies Inc.
VNNVF36.10N/A
N/A
VONOVIA SE
HFAHF1.09N/A
N/A
Navigator Global Invts Ltd.

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and GIG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and GIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
N/A
GIG - FACT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
RILYL - FACT
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
FGMCU - FACT
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
MLACU - FACT
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RILYP - FACT
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More

GIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIG and FACT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIG and FACT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIG
1D Price
Change %
GIG100%
-0.19%
FACT - GIG
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGGU - GIG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMYY - GIG
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
BEAG - GIG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMC - GIG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More