FACT
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.03 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
157.3M
FGMCU
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACT vs FGMCU

Header iconFACT vs FGMCU Comparison
Open Charts FACT vs FGMCUBanner chart's image
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
Volume$3.69K
Capitalization157.3M
FG Merger II
Price$10.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$137
CapitalizationN/A
FACT vs FGMCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACT vs. FGMCU commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACT is a Hold and FGMCU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FACT: $10.27 vs. FGMCU: $10.10)
Brand notoriety: FACT and FGMCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACT: 4% vs. FGMCU: 1%
Market capitalization -- FACT: $157.3M vs. FGMCU: $0
FACT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $157.3M. FGMCU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FACT and FGMCU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMCU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FACT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the short-term than FACT.

Price Growth

FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMCU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.41M vs. FACT (-4.83M). FACT has more cash in the bank: 47.5K vs. FGMCU (6.28K). FGMCU has less debt than FACT: FGMCU (845K) vs FACT (2.77M). FACT (0) and FGMCU (0) have equivalent revenues.
FACTFGMCUFACT / FGMCU
Capitalization157MN/A-
EBITDA-4.83M-2.41M200%
Gain YTD3.737N/A-
P/E Ratio1000.00N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash47.5K6.28K756%
Total Debt2.77M845K328%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACTFGMCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
13%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMBBY15.41N/A
N/A
Ambu A/S
POFCF0.06N/A
N/A
Petrofac Ltd
ESALF25.59N/A
N/A
Eisai Co., Ltd.
ITXXF2.20N/A
N/A
Itaconix plc
SSRSF0.03N/A
N/A
Silver Sands Resources Corp.

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and GIG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and GIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
N/A
GIG - FACT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RILYL - FACT
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
NHIC - FACT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMCU - FACT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVACU - FACT
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGMCU and ATMV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGMCU and ATMV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
N/A
ATMV - FGMCU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOD - FGMCU
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
ATMC - FGMCU
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
SPKL - FGMCU
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
MLAC - FGMCU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More