FACO
Price
$3.52
Change
+$0.11 (+3.23%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
129M
TRRSF
Price
$27.39
Change
-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACO vs TRRSF

Header iconFACO vs TRRSF Comparison
Open Charts FACO vs TRRSFBanner chart's image
First Acceptance
Price$3.52
Change+$0.11 (+3.23%)
Volume$3.67K
Capitalization129M
Trisura Group
Price$27.39
Change-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization1.3B
FACO vs TRRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACO vs. TRRSF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACO is a Hold and TRRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FACO: $3.52 vs. TRRSF: $27.39)
Brand notoriety: FACO and TRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACO: 68% vs. TRRSF: 19%
Market capitalization -- FACO: $129M vs. TRRSF: $1.3B
FACO [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $129M. TRRSF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than TRRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FACO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRRSF is a better buy in the short-term than FACO.

Price Growth

FACO (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -7.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRSF($1.3B) has a higher market cap than FACO($129M). TRRSF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: TRRSF (15.29) vs FACO (5.68). FACO YTD gains are higher at: 16.172 vs. TRRSF (0.403). TRRSF has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. FACO (401M). FACO has less debt than TRRSF: FACO (45.2M) vs TRRSF (158M). TRRSF has higher revenues than FACO: TRRSF (839M) vs FACO (522M).
FACOTRRSFFACO / TRRSF
Capitalization129M1.3B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.1720.4034,011%
P/E Ratio5.6815.2937%
Revenue522M839M62%
Total Cash401M1.52B26%
Total Debt45.2M158M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FACO vs TRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
FACO
TRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2958
SMR RATING
1..100
5554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FACO's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (85). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (58). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (55). This means that TRRSF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (62). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRSF (84). This means that FACO’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACOTRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCAYX59.63N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation Y
HRCPX64.54N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec A
AGTIX171.40N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Global Thematic I
LHCCX18.53N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care C
BISVX14.06N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Sustainable Val Inv

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and MBI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and MBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
N/A
MBI - FACO
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRRSF - FACO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYAN - FACO
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

TRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRSF
1D Price
Change %
TRRSF100%
N/A
BZLYF - TRRSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTGPF - TRRSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - TRRSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - TRRSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
RYAN - TRRSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More