Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAAAX vs GCRTX
FAAAX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAAAX vs. GCRTX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAAAX is a Hold and GCRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. FAAAX (524M). FAAAX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FAAAX (2.44) vs GCRTX (0.00). FAAAX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FAAAX (12 years) vs GCRTX (18 years). FAAAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than GCRTX (1.94). FAAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. GCRTX (179.00). FAAAX (1000) and GCRTX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. FAAAX (4.61). GCRTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.27 vs. FAAAX (1.36).
| FAAAX | GCRTX | FAAAX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.85 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.94 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.721 | 1.441 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 5.73B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 5.05 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.60 | 20.94 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.36 | 7.27 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.22 | 22.23 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers