FA
Price
$13.26
Change
+$0.67 (+5.32%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.19B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$70.57
Change
-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.2B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FA vs ULS

Header iconFA vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts FA vs ULSBanner chart's image
First Advantage
Price$13.26
Change+$0.67 (+5.32%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.19B
UL Solutions
Price$70.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$3.04K
Capitalization14.2B
FA vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
FA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FA vs. ULS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a Buy and ULS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FA: $12.59 vs. ULS: $70.62)
Brand notoriety: FA and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FA: 224% vs. ULS: 93%
Market capitalization -- FA: $2.19B vs. ULS: $14.2B
FA [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $2.19B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $14.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $6.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

FA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

FA is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.48% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($14.2B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.19B). FA has higher P/E ratio than ULS: FA (619.33) vs ULS (42.29). ULS YTD gains are higher at: -10.449 vs. FA (-13.352). ULS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 686M vs. FA (248M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. FA (217M). ULS has less debt than FA: ULS (736M) vs FA (2.11B). ULS has higher revenues than FA: ULS (3B) vs FA (1.46B).
FAULSFA / ULS
Capitalization2.19B14.2B15%
EBITDA248M686M36%
Gain YTD-13.352-10.449128%
P/E Ratio619.3342.291,465%
Revenue1.46B3B49%
Total Cash217M255M85%
Total Debt2.11B736M287%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWMI50.560.09
+0.18%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
FFGX32.37N/A
+0.01%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
FLEU34.88N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
IBDX25.47-0.01
-0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
HYFI37.66-0.02
-0.06%
AB High Yield ETF

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
-8.10%
BCO - FA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
CTAS - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
BRC - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
AZZ - FA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-1.47%
ARMK - ULS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
RELX - ULS
33%
Poorly correlated
-14.13%
CTAS - ULS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
FA - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.10%
RBA - ULS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More