FA
Price
$17.16
Change
+$0.20 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
31 days until earnings call
SCTBY
Price
$15.10
Change
+$0.28 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FA vs SCTBY

Header iconFA vs SCTBY Comparison
Open Charts FA vs SCTBYBanner chart's image
First Advantage
Price$17.16
Change+$0.20 (+1.18%)
Volume$381.65K
Capitalization2.33B
Securitas A B
Price$15.10
Change+$0.28 (+1.89%)
Volume$615
Capitalization5.9B
FA vs SCTBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FA vs. SCTBY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a Hold and SCTBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FA: $17.16 vs. SCTBY: $15.10)
Brand notoriety: FA and SCTBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FA: 32% vs. SCTBY: 237%
Market capitalization -- FA: $2.33B vs. SCTBY: $5.9B
FA [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.33B. SCTBY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $5.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCTBY is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCTBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FA is a better buy in the short-term than SCTBY.

Price Growth

FA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while SCTBY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBY($5.9B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.33B). FA has higher P/E ratio than SCTBY: FA (61.81) vs SCTBY (49.75). SCTBY YTD gains are higher at: 21.574 vs. FA (-8.382). SCTBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.51B vs. FA (211M). SCTBY has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. FA (214M). FA has less debt than SCTBY: FA (568M) vs SCTBY (46.5B). SCTBY has higher revenues than FA: SCTBY (157B) vs FA (764M).
FASCTBYFA / SCTBY
Capitalization2.33B5.9B40%
EBITDA211M9.51B2%
Gain YTD-8.38221.574-39%
P/E Ratio61.8149.75124%
Revenue764M157B0%
Total Cash214M7.94B3%
Total Debt568M46.5B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCTBY: Fundamental Ratings
SCTBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
59

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASCTBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEMI28.070.35
+1.27%
Columbia Select Technology ETF
FELG37.320.38
+1.03%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
RFLR25.430.10
+0.40%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Mgd Flr ETF
IOCT32.880.03
+0.08%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
DWX42.37-0.08
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P® International Dividend ETF

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
+1.18%
BCO - FA
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
BRC - FA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MMS - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BV - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.63%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More

SCTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBY and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBY and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBY
1D Price
Change %
SCTBY100%
N/A
IPSOF - SCTBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INPOY - SCTBY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
FA - SCTBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
EUBG - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEIQ - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More