Advertisement
FA vs LICN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a Hold and LICN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLICN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LICN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LICN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LICN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while LICN (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
FA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| FA | LICN | FA / LICN | |
| Capitalization | 2.33B | 31M | 7,526% |
| EBITDA | 211M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.382 | -88.232 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | 61.81 | 5.96 | 1,037% |
| Revenue | 764M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 214M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 568M | N/A | - |
| FA | LICN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 20 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
FA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.
LICN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LICN and CHGG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LICN and CHGG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LICN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LICN | 100% | N/A | ||
| CHGG - LICN | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| GV - LICN | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
| GEO - LICN | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.80% | ||
| BV - LICN | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.63% | ||
| FA - LICN | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||