F
Price
$13.28
Change
-$0.17 (-1.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
52.91B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RNLSY
Price
$8.54
Change
+$0.10 (+1.18%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

F vs RNLSY

Header iconF vs RNLSY Comparison
Open Charts F vs RNLSYBanner chart's image
Ford Motor
Price$13.28
Change-$0.17 (-1.26%)
Volume$71.48M
Capitalization52.91B
Renault SA
Price$8.54
Change+$0.10 (+1.18%)
Volume$21.92K
Capitalization12.26B
F vs RNLSY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
F vs. RNLSY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is F is a StrongBuy and RNLSY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (F: $13.28 vs. RNLSY: $8.54)
Brand notoriety: F: Notable vs. RNLSY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: F: 74% vs. RNLSY: 56%
Market capitalization -- F: $52.91B vs. RNLSY: $12.26B
F [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $52.91B. RNLSY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $12.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

F’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNLSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • F’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RNLSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RNLSY is a better buy in the long-term than F.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

F’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNLSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • F’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RNLSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, F is a better buy in the short-term than RNLSY.

Price Growth

F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while RNLSY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

F is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.05% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
F($52.9B) has a higher market cap than RNLSY($12.3B). RNLSY (11.62) and F (11.35) have similar P/E ratio . F YTD gains are higher at: 44.081 vs. RNLSY (-7.961). F has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.3B vs. RNLSY (-7.12B). RNLSY has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. F (15.7B). RNLSY has less debt than F: RNLSY (68.5B) vs F (164B). F has higher revenues than RNLSY: F (190B) vs RNLSY (56.9B).
FRNLSYF / RNLSY
Capitalization52.9B12.3B430%
EBITDA12.3B-7.12B-173%
Gain YTD44.081-7.961-554%
P/E Ratio11.3511.6298%
Revenue190B56.9B334%
Total Cash15.7B18.1B87%
Total Debt164B68.5B239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
F vs RNLSY: Fundamental Ratings
F
RNLSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5756
SMR RATING
1..100
6998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RNLSY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for F (84) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that RNLSY’s stock grew significantly faster than F’s over the last 12 months.

RNLSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as F (57) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that RNLSY’s stock grew similarly to F’s over the last 12 months.

F's SMR Rating (69) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as RNLSY (98) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.

F's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNLSY (58) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNLSY’s over the last 12 months.

RNLSY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for F (55) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that RNLSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than F’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRNLSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
F
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RNLSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRS49.091.26
+2.63%
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
HTUS43.02-0.61
-1.41%
Hull Tactical US ETF
ABNY9.31-0.14
-1.48%
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
PPA150.50-3.69
-2.39%
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
BBSC71.91-2.20
-2.97%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF

F and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, F has been loosely correlated with HMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if F jumps, then HMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To F
1D Price
Change %
F100%
-1.26%
HMC - F
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
GM - F
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
STLA - F
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
RNLSY - F
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
MBGYY - F
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More

RNLSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNLSY has been loosely correlated with VWAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNLSY jumps, then VWAGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNLSY
1D Price
Change %
RNLSY100%
+2.24%
VWAGY - RNLSY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
VWAPY - RNLSY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
STLA - RNLSY
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
MBGYY - RNLSY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
POAHY - RNLSY
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
More