EZPW
Price
$13.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
624.89M
31 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$29.33
Change
+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
236.25M
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs RM

Header iconEZPW vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs RMBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$13.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$555.89K
Capitalization624.89M
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$29.33
Change+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Volume$124.62K
Capitalization236.25M
EZPW vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. RM commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Buy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $13.62 vs. RM: $29.33)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 43% vs. RM: 251%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. RM: $236.25M
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.79% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EZPW($625M) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RM (14.49) and EZPW (13.89) have similar P/E ratio . EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 11.457 vs. RM (-12.028). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. RM (7.41M). EZPW has less debt than RM: EZPW (607M) vs RM (1.43B). EZPW has higher revenues than RM: EZPW (1.09B) vs RM (484M).
EZPWRMEZPW / RM
Capitalization625M236M265%
EBITDA168MN/A-
Gain YTD11.457-12.028-95%
P/E Ratio13.8914.4996%
Revenue1.09B484M224%
Total Cash219M7.41M2,954%
Total Debt607M1.43B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1266
SMR RATING
1..100
6513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1879
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (84). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (66). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (65). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (52). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (79). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XVIPF30.100.26
+0.88%
Xvivo Perfusion AB
CBUMY23.83N/A
N/A
China National Buildings Material
MIELF19.70N/A
N/A
Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
BTCWF0.09N/A
-1.76%
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
HMLN176.25-7.73
-4.20%
Hamlin Bank & Trust Co. (Smethport, PA)

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
N/A
FCFS - EZPW
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
KNMOF - EZPW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRAA - EZPW
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
RM - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
AGM - EZPW
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+0.51%
ENVA - RM
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.17%
ATLC - RM
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SYF - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
COF - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
AXP - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More