EZPW
Price
$15.42
Change
+$0.14 (+0.92%)
Updated
Aug 11, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
930.49M
93 days until earnings call
KNMOF
Price
$18.13
Change
+$4.03 (+28.58%)
Updated
Jan 19 closing price
Capitalization
824.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs KNMOF

Header iconEZPW vs KNMOF Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs KNMOFBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$15.42
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
Volume$935
Capitalization930.49M
Kanamoto
Price$18.13
Change+$4.03 (+28.58%)
Volume$165
Capitalization824.48M
EZPW vs KNMOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. KNMOF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a StrongBuy and KNMOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $15.28 vs. KNMOF: $18.13)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and KNMOF are both not notable
EZPW represents the Savings Banks, while KNMOF is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 75% vs. KNMOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $930.49M vs. KNMOF: $824.48M
EZPW [@Savings Banks] is valued at $930.49M. KNMOF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $824.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $653.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $55.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKNMOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KNMOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than KNMOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Savings Banks) experienced а +9.38% price change this week, while KNMOF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.11%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.12% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.59% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EZPW($930M) has a higher market cap than KNMOF($824M). KNMOF has higher P/E ratio than EZPW: KNMOF (14.95) vs EZPW (11.84). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 25.041 vs. KNMOF (0.000). KNMOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 53B vs. EZPW (187M). KNMOF has more cash in the bank: 56.7B vs. EZPW (472M). EZPW has less debt than KNMOF: EZPW (762M) vs KNMOF (59.6B). KNMOF has higher revenues than EZPW: KNMOF (212B) vs EZPW (1.23B).
EZPWKNMOFEZPW / KNMOF
Capitalization930M824M113%
EBITDA187M53B0%
Gain YTD25.0410.000-
P/E Ratio11.8414.9579%
Revenue1.23B212B1%
Total Cash472M56.7B1%
Total Debt762M59.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWKNMOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGORX70.670.56
+0.80%
Putnam Large Cap Growth R
PNBAX28.240.18
+0.64%
Virtus NFJ Large-Cap Value A
PORTX60.710.33
+0.55%
Trillium ESG Global Equity Investor
FFNAX13.780.02
+0.15%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A
EMAAX15.87-0.04
-0.25%
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
N/A
FCFS - EZPW
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
KNMOF - EZPW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RM - EZPW
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
ENVA - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WRLD - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

KNMOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNMOF has been loosely correlated with EZPW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KNMOF jumps, then EZPW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNMOF
1D Price
Change %
KNMOF100%
N/A
EZPW - KNMOF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CACC - KNMOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
SNTG - KNMOF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PRG - KNMOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
RWAY - KNMOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
More