EXPE
Price
$294.48
Change
+$3.72 (+1.28%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:25 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.63B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MED
Price
$11.80
Change
+$0.13 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
128.38M
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXPE vs MED

Header iconEXPE vs MED Comparison
Open Charts EXPE vs MEDBanner chart's image
Expedia Group
Price$294.48
Change+$3.72 (+1.28%)
Volume$2.38K
Capitalization35.63B
Medifast
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization128.38M
EXPE vs MED Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXPE vs. MED commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXPE is a Hold and MED is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (EXPE: $290.76 vs. MED: $11.68)
Brand notoriety: EXPE: Notable vs. MED: Not notable
EXPE represents the Consumer Sundries, while MED is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXPE: 94% vs. MED: 67%
Market capitalization -- EXPE: $35.63B vs. MED: $128.38M
EXPE [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $35.63B. MED’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $128.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $167.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $29.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $17.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXPE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EXPE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXPE is a better buy in the long-term than MED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXPE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXPE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than EXPE.

Price Growth

EXPE (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.16% price change this week, while MED (@Personnel Services) price change was +9.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXPE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

MED is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-3.16% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+2.25% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXPE($35.6B) has a higher market cap than MED($128M). MED has higher P/E ratio than EXPE: MED (584.00) vs EXPE (28.01). MED YTD gains are higher at: 9.363 vs. EXPE (2.630). EXPE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.79B vs. MED (8.26M). EXPE has more cash in the bank: 6.17B vs. MED (174M). MED has less debt than EXPE: MED (12.3M) vs EXPE (6.48B). EXPE has higher revenues than MED: EXPE (14.4B) vs MED (430M).
EXPEMEDEXPE / MED
Capitalization35.6B128M27,813%
EBITDA2.79B8.26M33,785%
Gain YTD2.6309.36328%
P/E Ratio28.01584.005%
Revenue14.4B430M3,349%
Total Cash6.17B174M3,546%
Total Debt6.48B12.3M52,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXPE vs MED: Fundamental Ratings
EXPE
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
1390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
478
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as EXPE (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to EXPE’s over the last 12 months.

EXPE's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that EXPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

EXPE's SMR Rating (13) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that EXPE’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

EXPE's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (78) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that EXPE’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as EXPE (32) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to EXPE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPEMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSGZF0.160.01
+5.77%
TriStar Gold, Inc.
NNGPF78.381.16
+1.51%
NN Group NV
ECIA0.19N/A
N/A
Encision, Inc.
NPACF16.30N/A
N/A
Quadient SA
AEDFF74.50N/A
N/A
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles

EXPE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXPE has been loosely correlated with BKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EXPE jumps, then BKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXPE
1D Price
Change %
EXPE100%
-3.07%
BKNG - EXPE
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
TNL - EXPE
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
VIK - EXPE
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
ABNB - EXPE
57%
Loosely correlated
-5.20%
CCL - EXPE
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
More

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MED has been loosely correlated with EXPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MED jumps, then EXPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
-1.02%
EXPE - MED
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
CSV - MED
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SCI - MED
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
TNL - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
MCW - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More