EXP
Price
$204.77
Change
+$1.78 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
25 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$33.48
Change
+$1.87 (+5.92%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXP vs SMID

Header iconEXP vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts EXP vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Eagle Materials
Price$204.77
Change+$1.78 (+0.88%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization9.3B
Smith-Midland
Price$33.48
Change+$1.87 (+5.92%)
Volume$192.22K
Capitalization247.2M
EXP vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXP vs. SMID commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a Buy and SMID is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EXP: $204.77 vs. SMID: $33.48)
Brand notoriety: EXP and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXP: 246% vs. SMID: 1232%
Market capitalization -- EXP: $9.3B vs. SMID: $247.2M
EXP [@Construction Materials] is valued at $9.3B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EXP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а +4.08% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +10.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.58% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXP($9.3B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than EXP: SMID (427.45) vs EXP (19.03). EXP YTD gains are higher at: -16.813 vs. SMID (-24.696). EXP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. SMID (3.43M). EXP has more cash in the bank: 48.9M vs. SMID (5.85M). SMID has less debt than EXP: SMID (5.94M) vs EXP (1.06B). EXP has higher revenues than SMID: EXP (2.25B) vs SMID (57.7M).
EXPSMIDEXP / SMID
Capitalization9.3B247M3,763%
EBITDA829M3.43M24,155%
Gain YTD-16.813-24.69668%
P/E Ratio19.03427.454%
Revenue2.25B57.7M3,905%
Total Cash48.9M5.85M836%
Total Debt1.06B5.94M17,856%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXP vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
EXP
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2844
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3647
SMR RATING
1..100
2950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXP's Valuation (19) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (72) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (47) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (50) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as EXP (61) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (98) in the null industry. This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNKHF4.65N/A
N/A
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
RICOF9.61N/A
N/A
Ricoh Company Ltd.
AURX1.32N/A
N/A
Nuo Therapeutics, Inc.
BPOSY2.57N/A
N/A
Bpost SA
BRER0.03N/A
N/A
Bresler & Reiner, Inc.

EXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXP
1D Price
Change %
EXP100%
+0.88%
MLM - EXP
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
VMC - EXP
76%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
CRH - EXP
73%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
BCC - EXP
71%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
KNF - EXP
71%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+5.92%
BCC - SMID
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
EXP - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
USLM - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
CRH - SMID
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
KNF - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More