Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.15M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$29.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. EXHAX (454M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.57) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. EXHAX (0.04). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.92 vs. EXHAX (3.64).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.962 | 20.707 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 24.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.04 | 11.58 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 57.08 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.64 | 30.92 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.22 | 95.38 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement