Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RBGEX
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.45
Change-$1.62 (-5.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.15M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.50
Change-$0.77 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
EXHAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. EXHAX (451M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: EXHAX (0.41) vs RBGEX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). RBGEX (1.18) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RBGEX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. EXHAX (-1.21). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 20.04 vs. EXHAX (-0.20).
| EXHAX | RBGEX | EXHAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.18 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.18 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.712 | 1.100 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | 11.15 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | 50.01 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.20 | 20.04 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.58 | 118.70 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement