Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs GWPDX
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPDX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.70
Change-$0.41 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
American Funds Growth Portfolio F3
Price$26.90
Change-$0.35 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
EXHAX vs GWPDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPDX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. EXHAX (458M). GWPDX pays higher dividends than EXHAX: GWPDX (0.74) vs EXHAX (0.61). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPDX: EXHAX (30 years) vs GWPDX (8 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GWPDX (0.38). EXHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWPDX: EXHAX (2000) vs GWPDX (1000000). GWPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. EXHAX (3.21). GWPDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.28 vs. EXHAX (22.07).
| EXHAX | GWPDX | EXHAX / GWPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.38 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.38 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.882 | 5.614 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 21.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.74 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 7.67 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 44.59 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 48.28 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers