Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs GWPAX
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.70
Change-$0.41 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
American Funds Growth Portfolio A
Price$26.78
Change-$0.34 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPAX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. EXHAX (458M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than GWPAX: EXHAX (0.61) vs GWPAX (0.43). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: EXHAX (30 years) vs GWPAX (13 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.73). GWPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: GWPAX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). GWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. EXHAX (3.21). GWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.59 vs. EXHAX (22.07).
| EXHAX | GWPAX | EXHAX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.882 | 5.433 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 21.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.43 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 7.29 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 43.60 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.07 | 46.59 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.22 | 69.31 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers