Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs GWPAX
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
American Funds Growth Portfolio A
Price$28.18
Change+$0.23 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPAX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. EXHAX (474M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than GWPAX: EXHAX (0.59) vs GWPAX (0.41). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: EXHAX (30 years) vs GWPAX (13 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.73). GWPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: GWPAX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). GWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. EXHAX (5.79). GWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.24 vs. EXHAX (22.81).
| EXHAX | GWPAX | EXHAX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.805 | 10.945 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.41 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 11.17 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 48.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.81 | 47.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.40 | 81.10 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers