Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs GWPAX
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.66
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets464.04M
American Funds Growth Portfolio A
Price$28.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPAX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. EXHAX (464M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than GWPAX: EXHAX (0.59) vs GWPAX (0.40). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: EXHAX (30 years) vs GWPAX (13 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.73). GWPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: GWPAX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). GWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. EXHAX (2.91). GWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.02 vs. EXHAX (16.35).
| EXHAX | GWPAX | EXHAX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.73 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.725 | 13.425 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 464M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 13.47 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.31 | 34.26 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.35 | 42.02 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.72 | 85.03 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers