EXETF
Price
$9.12
Change
-$0.08 (-0.87%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
459.44M
10 days until earnings call
FMCQF
Price
$52.15
Change
-$1.45 (-2.71%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXETF vs FMCQF

Header iconEXETF vs FMCQF Comparison
Open Charts EXETF vs FMCQFBanner chart's image
Extendicare
Price$9.12
Change-$0.08 (-0.87%)
Volume$49.18K
Capitalization459.44M
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$52.15
Change-$1.45 (-2.71%)
Volume$593
Capitalization13.88B
EXETF vs FMCQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EXETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXETF vs. FMCQF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXETF is a Hold and FMCQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EXETF: $9.12 vs. FMCQF: $52.15)
Brand notoriety: EXETF and FMCQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXETF: 1109% vs. FMCQF: 24%
Market capitalization -- EXETF: $459.44M vs. FMCQF: $13.88B
EXETF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $459.44M. FMCQF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXETF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EXETF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXETF is a better buy in the long-term than FMCQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXETF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCQF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXETF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXETF is a better buy in the short-term than FMCQF.

Price Growth

EXETF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while FMCQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXETF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.28% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCQF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than EXETF($459M). EXETF has higher P/E ratio than FMCQF: EXETF (140.85) vs FMCQF (22.03). EXETF YTD gains are higher at: 25.420 vs. FMCQF (14.918). FMCQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.35B vs. EXETF (57.3M). FMCQF has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. EXETF (105M). EXETF has less debt than FMCQF: EXETF (397M) vs FMCQF (13.3B). FMCQF has higher revenues than EXETF: FMCQF (19.6B) vs EXETF (1.24B).
EXETFFMCQFEXETF / FMCQF
Capitalization459M13.9B3%
EBITDA57.3M3.35B2%
Gain YTD25.42014.918170%
P/E Ratio140.8522.03639%
Revenue1.24B19.6B6%
Total Cash105M1.22B9%
Total Debt397M13.3B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXETF vs FMCQF: Fundamental Ratings
EXETF
FMCQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
1684
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXETF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCQF (9). This means that EXETF’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

EXETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCQF (100). This means that EXETF’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

EXETF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCQF (84). This means that EXETF’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

EXETF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCQF (52). This means that EXETF’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as EXETF (82). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to EXETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXETFFMCQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATEC10.820.11
+1.03%
Alphatec Holdings
FORL11.57N/A
N/A
Four Leaf Acquisition Corp
QETAU10.84N/A
N/A
Quetta Acquisition Corp
CHDN113.53-0.22
-0.19%
Churchill Downs
CCNE24.01-0.39
-1.60%
CNB Financial Corp

EXETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EXETF and FSNUF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EXETF and FSNUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXETF
1D Price
Change %
EXETF100%
-0.88%
FSNUF - EXETF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSNUY - EXETF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
INNV - EXETF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
FMCQF - EXETF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCEL - EXETF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
More

FMCQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMCQF and FSNUY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMCQF and FSNUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCQF
1D Price
Change %
FMCQF100%
N/A
FSNUY - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
AMED - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
OPCH - FMCQF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
CCEL - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
FSNUF - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More