Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs VWINX
EXBAX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.63M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.3B
EXBAX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. VWINX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. EXBAX (296M). VWINX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: VWINX (3.35) vs EXBAX (2.16). EXBAX was incepted earlier than VWINX: EXBAX (32 years) vs VWINX (56 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). VWINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. EXBAX (59.00). EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: EXBAX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. EXBAX (3.05). EXBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.10 vs. VWINX (0.24).
| EXBAX | VWINX | EXBAX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.23 | 461% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.23 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.929 | 5.255 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 49.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 3.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.05 | 4.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.20 | 11.46 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.10 | 0.24 | 2,129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.17 | 25.46 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers