Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs VTMFX
EXBAX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs VTMFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$15.01
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.61M
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Adm
Price$48.74
Change-$0.07 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.52B
EXBAX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. VTMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and VTMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. EXBAX (291M). VTMFX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: VTMFX (2.11) vs EXBAX (1.98). EXBAX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: EXBAX (32 years) vs VTMFX (31 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.09). EXBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. VTMFX (20.00). EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMFX: EXBAX (2000) vs VTMFX (10000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. EXBAX (4.08). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. EXBAX (6.09).
| EXBAX | VTMFX | EXBAX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.09 | 1,178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.09 | 1,178% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.314 | 1.422 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 10000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.11 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 8.48 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.63 | 33.26 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | 34.72 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.76 | 104.09 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers