Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs VTMFX
EXBAX vs VTMFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs VTMFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.63M
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Adm
Price$49.48
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.51B
EXBAX vs VTMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. VTMFX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and VTMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. EXBAX (296M). EXBAX (2.16) and VTMFX (2.07) have matching dividends . EXBAX was incepted earlier than VTMFX: EXBAX (32 years) vs VTMFX (31 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than VTMFX (0.09). EXBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. VTMFX (20.00). EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMFX: EXBAX (2000) vs VTMFX (10000). VTMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. EXBAX (2.90). VTMFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.04 vs. EXBAX (4.96).
| EXBAX | VTMFX | EXBAX / VTMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.09 | 1,178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.09 | 1,178% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.786 | 9.454 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 10000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 2.07 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.90 | 8.08 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 38.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.96 | 36.04 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.29 | 94.86 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers