Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs HBLVX
EXBAX vs HBLVX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLVX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$15.01
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.61M
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
EXBAX vs HBLVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. EXBAX (291M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLVX (3.46) vs EXBAX (1.98). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLVX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLVX (11 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EXBAX (70.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLVX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.25 vs. EXBAX (4.08). HBLVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.72 vs. EXBAX (6.09).
| EXBAX | HBLVX | EXBAX / HBLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.314 | 1.962 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 11.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 3.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 6.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.63 | 16.67 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | 13.72 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.76 | 56.53 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers