Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXBAX vs HBLFX
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$15.24
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.29M
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.30
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.75B
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a StrongBuy and HBLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. EXBAX (297M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLFX (3.53) vs EXBAX (2.16). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLFX (9 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: EXBAX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. HBLFX (2.94). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.32 vs. EXBAX (4.07).
| EXBAX | HBLFX | EXBAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.214 | 10.216 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 11.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 3.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 2.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.88 | 15.87 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.07 | 14.32 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement