Advertisement
EWZS vs PAGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWZS is a Hold and PAGS is a Hold.
PAGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EWZS | PAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DHINX | 13.12 | 0.08 | +0.61% |
| Centre Global Infrastructure Investor | |||
| HSGFX | 5.58 | 0.02 | +0.36% |
| Hussman Strategic Market Cycle Fund | |||
| PSYGX | 91.85 | -0.09 | -0.10% |
| Putnam Small Cap Growth Y | |||
| JANEX | 145.25 | -0.25 | -0.17% |
| Janus Henderson Enterprise D | |||
| DPRIX | 64.62 | -0.42 | -0.65% |
| BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Y | |||
EWZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZS has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWZS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZS | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| INTR - EWZS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| STNE - EWZS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| PAGS - EWZS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| VINP - EWZS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| PAX - EWZS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
PAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGS | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| STNE - PAGS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| COIN - PAGS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| CLSK - PAGS | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
| COMP - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| RIOT - PAGS | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
More | ||||