Advertisement
EWZS vs PAGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWZS is a StrongBuy and PAGS is a Hold.
PAGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EWZS | PAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FIJGX | 59.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications Z | |||
| VIOIX | 9.81 | -0.04 | -0.41% |
| VELA Income Opportunities I | |||
| NPNEX | 52.34 | -0.50 | -0.95% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value E | |||
| USRAX | 34.23 | -0.47 | -1.35% |
| Horizon Multi-Factor U.S. Equity Inv | |||
| HISGX | 11.38 | -0.36 | -3.07% |
| Harbor Small Cap Growth Inv | |||
EWZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZS has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWZS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZS | 100% | -2.28% | ||
| INTR - EWZS | 70% Closely correlated | -6.87% | ||
| STNE - EWZS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| PAGS - EWZS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| VINP - EWZS | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| PAX - EWZS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
PAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGS | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| STNE - PAGS | 79% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| COIN - PAGS | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.86% | ||
| CLSK - PAGS | 46% Loosely correlated | -10.13% | ||
| COMP - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| RIOT - PAGS | 40% Loosely correlated | -10.22% | ||
More | ||||