Advertisement
EWZS vs PAGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWZS is a Hold and PAGS is a Hold.
PAGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EWZS | PAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DGAGX | 41.15 | 0.24 | +0.59% |
| BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor | |||
| WEBAX | 10.60 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| TETON Westwood Balanced AAA | |||
| NWZLX | 21.64 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A | |||
| PRDSX | 47.03 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq | |||
| AMTZX | 10.43 | -0.02 | -0.19% |
| AB All Market Real Return Z | |||
EWZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZS has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWZS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZS | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| INTR - EWZS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| STNE - EWZS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| PAGS - EWZS | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VINP - EWZS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| PAX - EWZS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
More | ||||
PAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| STNE - PAGS | 81% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| COIN - PAGS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CLSK - PAGS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| COMP - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| RIOT - PAGS | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
More | ||||