| EWZS | ILF | EWZS / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 56.101 | 54.169 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 195M | 2.4B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 18.00 | 572% |
| Yield | 2.62 | 4.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| EWZS | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JANT | 40.65 | 0.10 | +0.25% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF | |||
| MUC | 10.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Blackrock Muniholdings California Quality Fund | |||
| PCHI | 24.92 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Polen High Income ETF | |||
| LDRT | 25.32 | -0.09 | -0.33% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| DRLL | 29.19 | -0.28 | -0.93% |
| Strive U.S. Energy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZS has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWZS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZS | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| INTR - EWZS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| STNE - EWZS | 68% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| PAGS - EWZS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.94% | ||
| PAX - EWZS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| VINP - EWZS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| NU - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||