EWW | VNAM | EWW / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 30.414 | 9.187 | 331% |
Net Assets | 1.96B | 13.5M | 14,481% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 13.16 | 76% |
Yield | 3.42 | 0.89 | 383% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
EWW | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago87% | 3 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | -0.83% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
AC - EWW | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.48% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and CMG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and CMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -1.44% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
FTS - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | -4.79% | ||
VHC - VNAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
More |