EWW | VNAM | EWW / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 34.161 | 17.578 | 194% |
Net Assets | 1.87B | 14.4M | 12,972% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 13.16 | 76% |
Yield | 4.40 | 1.02 | 430% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
EWW | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 5 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago86% | 5 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago87% | 25 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | +0.18% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
AC - EWW | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.19% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and CMG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and CMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | +0.70% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
FTS - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.89% | ||
VHC - VNAM | 10% Poorly correlated | +8.44% | ||
VRE - VNAM | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More |