EWW | MKOR | EWW / MKOR | |
Gain YTD | 38.793 | 34.127 | 114% |
Net Assets | 1.86B | 57.9M | 3,206% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.79 | 63% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 41.08 | 24% |
Yield | 4.30 | 3.96 | 108% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
EWW | MKOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago86% | 6 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | +1.21% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
AC - EWW | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MKOR and CPNG have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKOR and CPNG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MKOR | 100% | +0.61% | ||
CPNG - MKOR | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.63% |