EWW | KWT | EWW / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 28.812 | 23.221 | 124% |
Net Assets | 1.78B | 85.5M | 2,082% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 51.00 | 20% |
Yield | 4.40 | 3.41 | 129% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWW | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago54% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 5 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago90% | 9 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago87% | 7 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 5 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | -0.37% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
AC - EWW | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.19% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.