EWW | KWT | EWW / KWT | |
Gain YTD | 31.161 | 18.095 | 172% |
Net Assets | 1.84B | 87.5M | 2,104% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 | 68% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 51.00 | 20% |
Yield | 3.42 | 5.26 | 65% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
EWW | KWT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago87% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | +0.02% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.45% | ||
AC - EWW | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.29% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KWT and CGC have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWT and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.