EWW | FSZ | EWW / FSZ | |
Gain YTD | 43.903 | 22.095 | 199% |
Net Assets | 2.13B | 81M | 2,623% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.80 | 63% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 71.00 | 14% |
Yield | 4.30 | 1.63 | 264% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWW | FSZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 19 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | -0.44% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.98% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FSZ and ROG have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSZ and ROG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSZ | 100% | -1.52% | ||
ROG - FSZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
BAER - FSZ | 0% Poorly correlated | -5.62% | ||
ALC - FSZ | -6% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
SUN - FSZ | -7% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
LOGN - FSZ | -12% Poorly correlated | -3.97% |