Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWW vs FLAU
EWW vs FLAU Comparison
Open Charts EWW vs FLAU
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Price$66.13
Change-$0.92 (-1.37%)
Volume$1.99M
Net Assets2.19B
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Price$32.13
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
Volume$861
Net Assets78.68M
EWW vs FLAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWW vs. FLAU commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWW is a Hold and FLAU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWW has more net assets: 2.19B vs. FLAU (78.7M). EWW has a higher annual dividend yield than FLAU: EWW (43.794) vs FLAU (16.315). EWW was incepted earlier than FLAU: EWW (30 years) vs FLAU (8 years). FLAU (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than EWW (0.50). EWW has a higher turnover FLAU (6.07) vs FLAU (6.07).
| EWW | FLAU | EWW / FLAU | |
| Gain YTD | 43.794 | 16.315 | 268% |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 78.7M | 2,785% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 6.07 | 165% |
| Yield | 3.91 | 3.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWW | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MUIGX | 18.38 | 0.08 | +0.44% |
| Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R6 | |||
| CMALX | 26.85 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
| Crawford Multi-Asset Income | |||
| JGMNX | 29.18 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| Janus Henderson Triton N | |||
| JSJCX | 16.24 | -0.05 | -0.31% |
| JHancock Small Cap Dynamic Growth C | |||
| GOCAX | 15.40 | -0.15 | -0.96% |
| Gabelli International Small Cap A | |||
EWW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWW | 100% | -1.37% | ||
| OMAB - EWW | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| ACGP - EWW | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.09% |
FLAU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAU and TLS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAU and TLS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAU | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| TLS - FLAU | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| WOW - FLAU | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOL - FLAU | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ASX - FLAU | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| BEN - FLAU | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||