EWW | FLAU | EWW / FLAU | |
Gain YTD | 45.969 | 14.684 | 313% |
Net Assets | 2.16B | 77.6M | 2,784% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 10.00 | 6.07 | 165% |
Yield | 4.30 | 3.21 | 134% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
EWW | FLAU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 8 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | +1.44% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.32% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAU and ORI have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAU and ORI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU | 100% | -0.07% | ||
ORI - FLAU | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
WES - FLAU | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
NHC - FLAU | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.38% | ||
TPG - FLAU | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
AMP - FLAU | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More |