| EWU | FLGB | EWU / FLGB | |
| Gain YTD | 1.842 | 1.837 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 1.02B | 284% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 10.13 | 49% |
| Yield | 3.74 | 3.50 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| EWU | FLGB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWU has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWU jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGB | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| SHEL - FLGB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| RTO - FLGB | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| EVR - FLGB | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| HLN - FLGB | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| CCEP - FLGB | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||