Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$68.05
Change-$0.79 (-1.15%)
Volume$2.85K
Net Assets7.78B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$36.33
Change-$0.31 (-0.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.93M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 7.79B vs. MCHS (2.93M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCHS (9.392) vs EWT (8.343). EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (26 years) vs MCHS (2 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (36.00) vs EWT (36.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.343 | 9.392 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 7.79B | 2.93M | 265,881% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 115.31 | 31% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 3.21 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.02% |