Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$57.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.13M
Net Assets6.14B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$28.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.14B vs. MCHS (2.3M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCHS (12.640) vs EWT (11.766). EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (25 years) vs MCHS (1 year). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.766 | 12.640 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 2.3M | 266,855% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 115.31 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.28 | 5.06 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AMZP | 29.37 | 0.73 | +2.56% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Amazon ETF | |||
| ECOW | 21.76 | 0.20 | +0.95% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| DJD | 52.78 | 0.47 | +0.90% |
| Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF | |||
| NULV | 41.67 | 0.11 | +0.26% |
| Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | |||
| ABHY | 19.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A |