Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$59.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
Volume$2.09M
Net Assets6.37B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.23
Change+$1.89 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Buy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.37B vs. MCHS (2.5M). MCHS (15.191) and EWT (14.683) have matching annual dividend yield . EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (25 years) vs MCHS (2 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 14.683 | 15.191 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 2.5M | 254,920% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 115.31 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.10 | 4.86 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.43% |