Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$60.21
Change+$0.91 (+1.53%)
Volume$2.73M
Net Assets6.25B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.00
Change+$0.65 (+2.01%)
Volume$202
Net Assets2.59M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a StrongBuy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.26B vs. MCHS (2.59M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCHS (29.548) vs EWT (16.325). EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (25 years) vs MCHS (2 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 16.325 | 29.548 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 6.26B | 2.59M | 241,879% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 115.31 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 4.18 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.01% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.36% |