Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$64.86
Change+$0.23 (+0.36%)
Volume$33.96K
Net Assets6.95B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.12
Change-$0.15 (-0.45%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.67M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.95B vs. MCHS (2.67M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCHS (30.621) vs EWT (24.845). EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (25 years) vs MCHS (2 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.845 | 30.621 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 2.67M | 260,510% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 115.31 | 21% |
| Yield | 1.87 | 4.27 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.51% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.64% |