Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCHS
EWT vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCHS
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$60.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.62K
Net Assets6.32B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52M
EWT vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCHS commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.32B vs. MCHS (2.52M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCHS (21.030) vs EWT (16.480). EWT was incepted earlier than MCHS: EWT (25 years) vs MCHS (2 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCHS | EWT / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 16.480 | 21.030 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 2.52M | 250,913% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 115.31 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.05 | 4.55 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSL | 13.02 | 0.34 | +2.68% |
| GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | |||
| NULG | 97.32 | 0.42 | +0.43% |
| Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| CGMM | 27.14 | 0.06 | +0.22% |
| Capital Group U.S. Small & Mid Cap ETF | |||
| YLD | 19.24 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Principal Active High Yield ETF | |||
| USAI | 39.18 | -0.36 | -0.90% |
| Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.68% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.23% |