Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCH
EWT vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCH
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$65.09
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
Volume$3.91M
Net Assets6.77B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.94
Change-$0.24 (-0.82%)
Volume$4.6K
Net Assets22.82M
EWT vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCH commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 6.77B vs. MCH (22.8M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCH (31.259) vs EWT (25.753). EWT was incepted earlier than MCH: EWT (25 years) vs MCH (3 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCH | EWT / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 25.753 | 31.259 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 6.77B | 22.8M | 29,702% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 55.22 | 43% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 0.95 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||