Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWT vs MCH
EWT vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts EWT vs MCH
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Price$64.85
Change+$0.22 (+0.34%)
Volume$3.28M
Net Assets7.04B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.35%)
Volume$6.56K
Net Assets23.1M
EWT vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWT vs. MCH commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 7.04B vs. MCH (23.1M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than EWT: MCH (30.839) vs EWT (24.845). EWT was incepted earlier than MCH: EWT (25 years) vs MCH (3 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover EWT (24.00) vs EWT (24.00).
| EWT | MCH | EWT / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 24.845 | 30.839 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 23.1M | 30,459% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 55.22 | 43% |
| Yield | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWT | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||