EWP | VNM | EWP / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 61.126 | 67.247 | 91% |
Net Assets | 1.45B | 611M | 237% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 21.00 | 71% |
Yield | 2.63 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
EWP | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 26 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 4 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.